Well… it’s
suppose I need to talk about the changes I want doing to my study programme,
but my study programme it’s actually very good, it’s critical, utilizing methods
inductive o deductive depending to the situation, maintaining a character
performative when everything it’s related, but it’s carry out with a deepening
in the themes.
But if I
need to say something about it, even considered the previous, I would say the teaching
methods.
I have
really good teachers, all of them have a lot of knowledge, but that don’t mean
they are specially goods for explain that knowledge. And it’s not their fault,
I’m not the kind of person to blame the persons, because the persons are not
the problem, always is the system, in this case the teaching methods.
This
method follows a static methodology, with the students and the teachers explaining
and asking about a topic in a classroom. In this perspective the student just writing
and ask if they have a confusion or if they need an explanation, but the
logical it’s very directive. What plus to the space and the disposition in that
space facilitate the development for part of the student and even for part of
the teacher.
Another
aspect in this method is the disengagement between the class and the life out
of the class, separating for example the lecture and the analysis of this
lecture in spaces out of the class, a big and erroneous aspect in my opinion.
This is just
a critic, I know, and I don’t offering a solution, I only want show an aspect about
the study programme which, in my opinion, it need to be changed.
See you.